« P + S: The People Matter | Main | P + S: 3 Steps to Organizing Your Photos »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Hi, Donna! Welcome back to blogland--great to see you back here! :o) I enjoyed that story with Jamie Lee Curtis in More magazine (I really like that mag!)--she has a great, fresh approach to aging, etc. I don't go in for touching up too much with photos--especially where people are concerned. If too much is alter, then what is the real story? I believe in keeping it real with photos. Great post! Happy New Year, Donna! Wishing you & yours all the very best of health & happiness, peace & joy in 2011! ((HUGS))

Donna Raagas

Thanks, Tracy, for your comment. I agree--if photos aren't an accurate "snapshot in time", then what is? That's why candids are so much fun for me, even though they're not always high-quality. I like celebrating the unpredictability of life, and altered photos usually fit a preconceived image of an ideal. If everybody understands that about magazine covers, Then no harm done--covers are just a marketing tool. But who wants to see predictable photos of people you know? Surprises are much more fun! In the case of the sports program, I can't believe that pro team owners who are willing to pay unearthly salaries to the players wouldn't just order up a new team photo. They must have wanted the background, specifically, St. Basil's cathedral in Russia. The altered New York Nets picture probably cost more to create!

The comments to this entry are closed.

what's picturetelling?

  • Sure, a picture is worth a thousand words--but pictures alone are up for interpretation. Story is essential to understanding your pictures! I can show you how to tell your pictures with the stories that bring them to life

My Photo

blogs I read

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 05/2009